Poll: Are you happy to sacrifice loading times and a lot of page scrolling for larger signatures (by around 50-100 pixels)

**matt** · 11-01-2010, 10:28 AM

Please vote but comments are not required.

b-rad · 15-01-2010, 01:41 PM

So are we adding them then? I dont think anyone else is going to vote.

Cassie · 16-01-2010, 12:58 PM

Hopefully so. =)

b-rad · 16-01-2010, 04:59 PM

12 people have voted, and that is all who have expressed an interest in this.

Cassie · 17-01-2010, 12:15 AM

Why has the 'no' option suddenly increased by about 5 votes? What the hell? Earlier today it had 2 or 3 IIRC, for a while now, and a few hours later it has 8? Okay then.. o.O

b-rad · 17-01-2010, 12:35 AM

Yeah, WTF. I wonder if the guests are voting now -.-

Cassie · 17-01-2010, 12:48 AM

They're not, and they can't. =S
Not sure what happened, but it wasn't like that this morning, so something went peculiar.
Haven't the signature limits been extended now anyway? Or am I imagining things? I swear my scroller is shorter. Tongue

b-rad · 17-01-2010, 01:10 AM

Ooh, looks like we got some pixels Smile

Cassie · 17-01-2010, 08:04 AM

Well I removed the words on my signatures and I no longer have a scroller. Smile

Thank you so much! I really appreciate it. Cheers. =D

2qewl4u · 17-01-2010, 02:33 PM

I have never seen a scroller in anyone's signatures ???

Poll: Are you happy to sacrifice loading times and a lot of page scrolling for larger signatures (by around 50-100 pixels) This poll is closed.
Yes	9	45.00%
No	9	45.00%
I don't care	2	10.00%
Total	20 votes	100%